Jonathan Porter
The last one was kinda dumb because she basically was just a model for all that 3D mapping projected onto her. If she had moved the slightest, it would of thrown the projection off and made it in disproportion to her body.
The real talent is the person who programed the actual graphics for the 3D projection mapping. Anyone can just stand there in a "blank canvas" type outfit and have 3D mapped graphics projected onto them.
In fact, It would of been a lot better if they just used a mannequin to eliminate human error. Or even better, use a entirely different background or object(s) to 3D map and show more of the potential and talent of the real artist who programed all the graphics.
Don't get me wrong, it was pretty cool and all, but it has way more potential and could have been a lot more stellar, if it didn't feature a motionless individual just standing on a stage in a silly bodysuit stiff as a board with their hands on their hips the whole time.
zach suedmeyer
The last one seems like it is not tallent. Coding a computer to light up someone no matter how intricate the lights appear to be is just making a light turn on and off.
It is impressive and it is a skill, a great skill, but they could have done the same on a wall or a body of water even. I admire them for having something cool but they did not make a live performance which is what a talent is. Something that you are good at that you can do live.
No comments:
Post a Comment